Policy Luncheon, May 5, 1992

Transcription (Scripto)

Download Full Text Only (DOCX)

Extent (Dublin Core)

17 Pages

File Name (Dublin Core)

lead_403_027_all

Title (Dublin Core)

Policy Luncheon, May 5, 1992

Date (Dublin Core)

1992-05-05

Date Created (Dublin Core)

1992-05-05

Congress (Dublin Core)

102nd (1991-1993)

Policy Area (Curation)

Congress

Creator (Dublin Core)

Dole, Robert J., 1923-2021

Kasten, Robert W., 1942-

U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee

Record Type (Dublin Core)

schedules (time plans)

Rights (Dublin Core)

http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/

Language (Dublin Core)

eng

Collection Finding Aid (Dublin Core)

https://dolearchivecollections.ku.edu/index.php?p=collections/findingaid&id=26&q=

Physical Location (Dublin Core)

Collection 007, Box 403, Folder 27

Institution (Dublin Core)

Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS

Archival Collection (Dublin Core)

Robert J. Dole Republican Leadership Collection, 1985-1996

Full Text (Extract Text)

Page 1:
POLICY LUNCH
MAY 5, 1992

SCHEDULE
Pending - Rescission Package
Committee Substitute is pending business.
Amenable in 2 degrees
Amendment Tree expected to be filled by Senator Byrd
Agreeing to 2[nd] Degree Amendment in the nature of a substitute makes the substitute (in effect) not subject to further amendment.
Dinner for the Senate wives is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. in Russell Caucus Room.
Further Schedule.
Telephone Privacy - (Caller I.D.)
Corporation for Public Broadcasting. If agreement is reached - could be taken up as early as Thursday. Will still require at least two votes on amendments (ITVS and reducing amount of increase on authorization).
Release of Independent Counsel Report scheduled for this afternoon.

Page 2:
SCHEDULE FOR THE WEEK OF MAY 4, 1992

TODAY, TUESDAY, MAY 5
THE SENATE WILL RECONVENE AT 2:15 P.M., AND RESUME CONSIDERATION OF THE RESCISSION BILL, UNDER THE STATUTORY TIME LIMITATION OF 10 HOURS. AMENDMENTS ARE EXPECTED TO BE OFFERED, THEREFORE, VOTES CAN BE EXPECTED TO OCCUR DURING TODAY'S SESSION, HOWEVER, THE SENATE IS NOT EXPECTED TO BE IN SESSION LATE THIS EVENING.

WEDNESDAY, MAY 6
THE SENATE WILL RESUME AND PRESUMABLY COMPLETE ACTION ON THE RESCISSION BILL. THEREFORE, VOTES WILL OCCUR. FOLLOWING THE RESCISSION BILL, IT IS EXPECTED THAT THE MAJORITY LEADER WILL TURN TO THE TELEPHONE PRIVACY BILL. THEREFORE, VOTES WILL OCCUR.

THURSDAY, MAY 7 - FRIDAY, MAY 8
IN ADDITION TO THE TELEPHONE PRIVACY BILL, THE SENATE COULD BE ASKED TO TURN TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, THEREFORE VOTES CAN BE EXPECTED TO OCCUR:

CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING
SPORTS GAMBLING
LUMBEE INDIAN BILL
MOTOR VOTER

NOTE:
THE MAJORITY LEADER HAS INDICATED THAT NO ROLL CALL VOTES WILL OCCUR ON MONDAY, MAY 11, 1992.

Page 3:
POSSIBLE LEGISLATION TO BE CONSIDERED
(NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST)

RESCISSION LEGISLATION (10 HOUR T/A-TUESDAY, 5/5) *
CORPORATION PUBLIC BROADCASTING *
LUMBEE INDIAN BILL *
TELEPHONE PRIVACY *
SPORTS GAMBLING *
MOTOR VOTER *

BUDGET RESOL. CONFERENCE REPORT (10 HOUR T/A)
PARENTAL LEAVE
OLDER AMERICANS CONFERENCE REPORT
RECONCILIATION BILL (10 HOUR T/A)
S. 1942, SUNSHINE BILL
GSE REFORMS (FANNIE MAE, ETC ... )
RTC EXTENSION
CONST. AMENDMENT/BALANCED BUDGET
SOVIET AID PACKAGE
LEAD REDUCTION
UNEMPLOYMENT EXTENSION (IF WORKED OUT BY BOTH SIDES)
CRIME ISSUE:
POSSIBLE VOTE ON SENATE WAITING PERIOD BILL
MONTREAL AVAIATION PROTOCOLS

* DENOTES POSSIBLE CONSIDERATION DURING THE WEEK OF MAY 4, 1992

Page 4:
POSSIBLE LEGISLATION TO BE CONSIDERED
(NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST)

RESCISSION LEGISLATION (10 HOUR T/A-TUESDAY, 5/5) *
CORPORATION PUBLIC BROADCASTING *
LUMBEE INDIAN BILL *
TELEPHONE PRIVACY *
SPORTS GAMBLING *
MOTOR VOTER *

BUDGET RESOL. CONFERENCE REPORT (10 HOUR T/A)
PARENTAL LEAVE
OLDER AMERICANS CONFERENCE REPORT
RECONCILIATION BILL (10 HOUR T/A)
S. 1942, SUNSHINE BILL
GSE REFORMS (FANNIE MAE, ETC ... )
RTC EXTENSION
CONST. AMENDMENT/BALANCED BUDGET
SOVIET AID PACKAGE
LEAD REDUCTION
UNEMPLOYMENT EXTENSION (IF WORKED OUT BY BOTH SIDES)
CRIME ISSUE:
POSSIBLE VOTE ON SENATE WAITING PERIOD BILL
MONTREAL AVAIATION PROTOCOLS

* DENOTES POSSIBLE CONSIDERATION DURING THE WEEK OF MAY 4, 1992

Page 5:
Poll Watch
A Review of Recent National Polling Data
[Poll Watch logo: chart depicting several rises and falls]

From the Office of the GOP Conference Secretary
Bob Kasten, Secretary

Bill Canfield, Staff Director
Rick Dearborn, Deputy
202-224-3496

Contents
5/5/92
PENNSYLVANIA: Exit Polls
(Chilton Research Poll: 1,816 Dem & 1,327 GOPers surveyed 4/28; margin of error +/- 3%)

The Rodney King Verdict
(NEWSWEEK Poll: 608 adults surveyed 4/30-5/1; margin of error +/- 5%; rel. 5/11)

Racism Seen in King Verdict ?
(TIME/CNN Poll: 798 whites and 200 blacks surveyed 4/30; margin of error +/- 3.5%)

89% Say Jury Wrong; 82% Want Federal Trial
(USA Today Poll: 855 adults surveyed 4/30; 536 whites and 319 blacks margin of error +/- 4% and +/- 6% repectively; rel. USA Today 5/1)

INDIANA: Bush-Quayle Below 50% in 3-way Race
(Pol. Media Research Poll: 827 LVs surveyed 4/27-29; margin of error +/- 3.5%)

NORTH CAROLINA: Perot in Tobacco Country
(Mason-Dixon Poll: 832 LVs surveyed 4/26-28; margin of error +/- 5%)

Page 6:
1

PENNSYLVANIA: EXIT POLLS
(Chilton Research Poll: 1,816 Dem voters, 1,327 GOPers surveyed; margin of error +/- 3%; rel. W. Post 4/29)

Republicans
Democrats
November Vote

Bush
59%
12%
Clinton
8
55
Perot
27
25
Describe Your Vote

Strongly Favor
33%
32%
Like/reservations
41
43
Dislike others
24
22
Satisfied with Party's Cand.?

Satisfied
52%
39%
Want other
45
56
Does ... have honesty/integrity to serve?

Your Rep.

Yes
63%
59%
No
32
35
Bush

Yes
--
27%
No
--
69
Clinton

Yes
--
61%
No
--
34
Should have confirmed Thomas?

Yes
59%
36%
No
25
49
Not Sure
14
14
Opinion on Roe v. Wade

Keep abortion legal
56%
66%
Overturn
38
29

Page 7:
2

The Rodney King Verdict
(Newsweek Poll: 608 adults surveyed 4/30-5/1 by Gallup; margin of error +/- 5%; subsamples 350 whites +/- 6%; 242 blacks +/- 7%; rel. 5/11 issue)

ALL
White
Black
Fall Match-up
Bush
38%
40%
21%
Clinton
27
24
51
Perot
22
24
9
Undec.
13
12
19
King Verdict
Justified
10%
12%
4%
Not justified
77
73
92
Don't Know
13
15
4
The Post-Verdict Violence
Justified
16%
16%
16%
Not justified
79
79
74
Don't Know
5
5
10
Civil Rights action in King case
Would favor
79%
77%
91%
Not favor
15
17
6
Don't Know
6
6
3
Is Bush doing as much as he can to...

Reduce local level crime?
Yes
23%
24%
18%
No
66
65
76
Don't Know
11
11
6
Guarantee blacks equal justice?
Yes
34%
37%
17%
No
54
49
78
Don't Know
12
14
5
Would a Dem. Admin. do more to help blacks or not be much difference?
Do more
28%
25%
42%
Not much difference
55
58
37
Be Worse
1
1
1
How much respect do you have for police in your area?
Great deal
56%
58%
48%
Some
34
34
35
Hardly any
8
7
14

Page 8:
3

RACISM SEEN IN KING VERDICT?
(Time/CNN Poll: 798 white and 200 black Americans surveyed 4/30; margin of error +/- 3.5% and 7% respectively; rel. 5/11 issue)

WHITES
BLACKS
How would you have found the police if you were on the jury?
Guilty
60%
91%
Not guilty
4
2
Guilty on some charges (vol.)
2
1
Not sure
34
6
Which describes the reason for the jury's not guilty verdict?
Poor prosecution
21%
19%
Inadequate evidence
19
2
Loyalty to police
18
21
Racism
12
45
Good defense
10
3
How many police in your area are prejudiced against blacks?
All or most
6%
25%
Some
12
25
A few
18
26
None/almost none
38
10
Which makes you angrier, the verdict or violence that followed?
Verdict
26%
52%
Violence
33
12
Were the events in L.A. ...?
A genuine reaction to the verdict
24%
38%
People took advantage of situation
58
46
Have prejudice and discrimination against blacks grown recently?
Yes
31%
54%
No
26
10
Same
36
35
Would the verdict been different if there had been any blacks on the jury?
Different
64%
89%
Same
16
5

Page 9:
4

89% SAY JURY WRONG; 82% WANT FEDERAL TRIAL
(USA Today Poll: 855 adults surveyed 4/30; subsamples 536 whites with +/- 4% margin of error, 319 blacks with +/- 6% margin of error; rel. USA Today 5/1)

ALL
WHITE
BLACK
Was the King verdict right?
Right
11%
14%
0%
Wrong
89
86
100%
Most to blame for the verdict?
Legal system
59%
58%
59%
Society in general
41
42
41
Do you think this case is a relatively isolated incident or evidence of widespread racism in society?
Isolated
31%
37%
10%
Evidence of Racism
67
63
90
Justice system biased v. blacks?
Yes
--
36%
81%
No
--
64
19
Is the rioting in Los Angeles...
Completely unjustified
49%
51%
34%
Wrong but understandable
49
47
61
Proper response
2
2
5
Should police in the case be tried on federal civil rights charges?
Yes
82%
79%
95%
No
18
--
--
How much police brutality is there against minority groups?
A lot/considerable
68%
63%
93%
Little/very little
32
37
7

Are race relations in the U.S. ...

ALL
WHITE
MARCH
BLACK
MARCH
Excellent
1%
1%
2%
--
2%
Good
27
29
32
13%
19
Not so good
50
53
44
44
48
Poor
22
17
20
43
30

Page 10:
5

INDIANA: BUSH-QUAYLE BELOW 50% IN 3-WAY RACE
(Political Media Research Poll: 827 likely voters surveyed 4/27-29; margin of error +/- 3.5%; subsamples: 289 Dem LVs; 276 GOPer LVs, +/- 6.9%; rel. WISH-TV, WHTI-TV 4/30)

Job Ratings
Bush
Quayle
Excellent
10%
10%
Good
32
39
Fair
35
25
Poor
23
26

FAV
/
UNFAV
Bush
51%
/
31%
Quayle
46
/
35
Perot
39
/
19
Clinton
22
/
47
Buchanan
16
/
51
Brown
15
/
49

General
2-way
3-way
Bush
57%
46%
Clinton
34
18
Perot
--
30
Undec.
9
6

Dem Primary
VOTE
FAV
/
UNFAV
Clinton
55%
48%
/
24%
Brown
15
20
/
52
Tsongas
9

Undec.
21

GOP Primary
VOTE
Bush
77%
Buchanan
12
Undec.
11

Page 11:
6

NORTH CAROLINA: PEROT IN TOBACCO COUNTRY
(Mason-Dixon Poll: 832 likely voters surveyed 4/26-28; margin of error +/- 3.5%; Subsamples: 469 DEM LVS, +/- 5%; 237 GOP LVs, +/- 6%; rel. Greensboro News & Record 4/30)

Bush Job

Excellent
8%
Good
31
Fair
44
Poor
17

NOW

2/92

FAV
/
UNFAV
ID
FAV
/
UNFAV
Bush
43%
/
37%
100%
45%
/
40%
Perot
34
/
9
87

Clinton
29
/
41
98
33
/
17
Brown
18
/
48
96

Buchanan
17
/
44
97

DEM PRIMARY
VOTE
FAV
/
UNFAV
Clinton
60%
39%
/
27%
Brown
13
19
/
44
Tsongas
7

Undec.
20

GOP Primary
VOTE
FAV
/
UNFAV
Bush
78%
59%
/
17%
Buchanan
17
24
/
44
Undec.
5

THREE-WAY
ALL
DEM
IND
GOP
MEN
WOM
WHI
BLA
Bush
39%
25%
48%
62%
37%
39%
46%
4%
Perot
27
28
26
25
33
21
31
9
Clinton
26
38
18
4
25
27
14
75
Undec.
8
9
12
9
5
13
8
12

TWO-WAY
NOW
2/90
Bush
53%
44%
Clinton
35
40
Undec.
12
16

Page 12:
U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee
Don Nickles, Chairman
Rick Lawson, Staff Director

Legislative Notice
Editor, Judy Gorman Prinkey

No. 67

May 5, 1992

S. 2403 - Rescission Bill, 1992

Calendar No. 452

Reported: From the Appropriations Committee on April 30, 1992, by a vote of 19-9, with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Voting in opposition were Senators Stevens, Garn, Cochran, Kasten, Specter, Domenici, Gramm, Bond, and Gorton. Four Republicans joined the 15 Democrats in supporting the bill: Senators Hatfield, D'Amato, Rudman, and Nickles. S. Rept. 102-274.

NOTEWORTHY
· The Majority Leader intends to move to consideration of S. 2403 at 10:00 am on Tuesday, May 5, 1992. The bill would reduce FY1991 and 1992 appropriations already enacted by $8.3 billion, which is $426,000 more than requested by the President in his requests to Congress.

· Section 1017 of the Budget Act provides a method for as few as one-fifth of the Senate to require discharge of a rescission bill introduced pursuant to an Administration message if the Appropriations Committee has not reported a measure within 45 days of continuous session. The committee has been able, by reporting this bill, to effectively prohibit Senators from using special procedures that would have allowed each rescission request to be considered individually.

· Because the committee bill is a substitute to S. 2403, it is expected a unanimous consent request will be made for the committee substitute to be treated as original text for further amendments. Under Section 1017(d) of the Budget Act, however, subsequent perfecting amendments to add back recissions contained in the President's request but deleted by the committee would not be germane if such a request is agreed to.

· The list of appropriation items in the substitute amendment proposed by the Appropriations Committee is very different from the Administration's original rescission proposal, although the totals in budget authority and outlays are close:

BA
Outlays
Administration
$7.863 billion
$1.192 billion
Senate
$8.267 billion
$2.700 billion

· The Administration proposed, for example, reducing the current Seawolf submarine program by eliminating two of three currently funded submarines; the Committee substitute bill has proposed instead eliminating FY92's procurement for the B2 bomber and a crippling cut in the SDI program.

· This is the first rescission to be debated in the Senate under the provisions of Title 10 of the Congressional Budget Act, which imposes a total 10-hour time limit on debate on the bill (amendments are limited to two hours; one hour on second degree amendments), as well as the rule of germaneness. Germane amendments would be: Committee amendments; amendments to strike; an amendment to change a number; an amendment adding language to restrict the subject matter of a provision in the bill; and Sense of the Senate (or Congress) amendments limited to matters within the jurisdiction of the Appropriations Committee.

Page 13:
HIGHLIGHTS
· S. 2403 purports to encompass rescissions submitted to Congress by the President on March 10, March 20, April 8, and April 9, 1992, which would reduce defense spending by $7.142 billion and domestic discretionary spending by $721 million for a total of $7.863 billion.

· While exceeding the President's totals, however, the Committee substitute substantially alters the mixture of programs the Administration identified as candidates for rescission. The committee substitute totals $7.025 billion in defense, $172 million in international, and $911 million in domestic discretionary spending, for a total of $8.289 billion or $426 million more than the amounts requested by the President.

BACKGROUND
In vetoing the tax bill earlier this year, the President criticized Congress for neglecting the national interest and concerning itself with parochial, political, and pork-barrel interests. He announced a list of items appropriated in the FY 1991 and 1992 budget that he would reduce or eliminate and, under the provisions of Title 10 of the Congressional Budget Act a list of these items was sent to Congress on March 10, 1992. Additional proposals were sent to Congress on March 20, April 8, and April 9, 1992. All of the President's proposals are encompassed by S. 2403, of which Title I is identical to S. 2402; Title III is identical to S. 2551; and Title IV is identical to S. 2570. Senator McCain subsequently introduced each of the items proposed by the President as an individual rescission bill, but none of these was reported by the committee.

The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 instituted the formal process of rescission as a statutory alternative to the impoundment power regularly exercised by Presidents since Thomas Jefferson to reduce unnecessary government spending. When the President sends a rescission message to the Congress, the agencies charged with carrying out the appropriations have 45 days following such a special message during which they may withhold appropriated funds, after which, if Congress has not acted, spending must occur. The effect of a rescission bill is to repeal a previous appropriation.

ADMINISTRATION POSITION
Not available at press time.

2

Page 14:
SUMMARY
Comparison of proposed rescissions by Appropriations Subcommittee
(Budget Authority, in thousands of dollars)

Subcommittee
President's Proposed
House
Senate
Senate Compared to Proposed Rescissions
Agriculture
Office/Public Affairs
--
--
-62
-62
Statistics Service
--
--
-2,000
-2,000
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
-100
-100
--
+100
Cooperative State Research
-10,852
-1,656
-1,943
+8,909
Extension Service
-797
--
--
+797
Nat'l Agricultural Library
-500
-462
-3,000
-2,500
Farmers Home Admin.
--
-10,031
-6,031
-6,031
Total
-12,249
-12,249
-13,036
-787
Commerce, Justice, State
Commerce

Public Telecommunications
-21,425
-7,677
--
+21,425
State

Buildings Abroad
--
--
-12,248
-12,248
Related Agencies

Israel relay station
--
-13,748
--
--
Economic Development Admin.
--
--
-9,200
-9,200
Total
-21,425
-21,425
-21,448
-23
Defense
Personnel, Army
--
-432
--
--
Operations and Maintenance

Army
-92,850
-27,320
-190,089
-98,239
Navy
-104,650
-20,911
-169,882
-65,232
Marines
-22,000
--
--
+22,000
Air Force
-4,500
-37,346
-189,950
-185,450
Defense Agencies
-20,200
-84,470
-260,321
-240,121

3

Page 15:
Subcommittee
President's Proposed
House
Senate
Senate Compared to Proposed Rescissions
Procurement
Army
-682,900
-192,170
-257,000
+425,900
Navy
-3,742,900
2,175,591
1,392,700
+2,350,200
Marines
-46,700
-54,700
-55,000
-8,300
Air Force
--
-403,393
-1,696,700
-1,696,700
Defense Agencies
-154,800
-13,900
-52,700
+102,100
National Guard & reserve.
-1,051,600
--
-45,000
+1,006,600
Research and Development
Army
-106,200
-251,300
-242,800
-136,600
Navy
-140,600
-403,156
-50,500
+90,100
Air Force
-378,900
-521,400
-928,300
-549,400
Defense Agencies
-456,900
-536,800
-1,360,700
-903,800
Other
Revolving Funds
--
-82,900
-60,000
-60,000
Museums, research
--
--
-117,250
-117,250
Intelligence community staff
--
-5,000
--
--
Total
-7,005,700
-4,810,789
-7,068,892
-63,192
Energy and Water
Corps of Engineers
-4,350
-500
-4,350
--
General Science & Research
--
-3,350
--
--
Energy Dept. Admin.
--
-500
--
--
Total
-4,350
-4,350
-4,350
--
Foreign Operations
International Development Association
--
-32,500
-32,500
-32,500
Inter-American Development Bank
--
-2,000
-4,000
-4,000
International organizations
--
-100
-100
-100
Unspent bilateral economic assistance
--
-6,320
--
--
Agency for International Development
--
-41
-64
-64
International Fund for Ireland
--
--
-10,000
-10,000
Economic Support Fund
--
-1,100
-30,000
-30,000
Aid to Philippines
--
--
-20,000
-20,000
International military training
--
-1,905
-1,925
-1,925
Foreign military financing
--
-66,100
-61,525
-61,525
Total
--
-110,066
-160,114
-160,114

4

Page 16:
Subcommittee
President's Proposed
House
Senate
Senate Compared to Proposed Rescissions
Interior
National Park Service
-9,675
-20,057
-4,937
+4,738
Bureau of Indian Affairs
-14,473
-8,593
-5,897
+8,576
Bureau of Mines
--
--
-987
-987
Forest Service
--
--
-19,000
-19,000
Fossil energy research
-145
-144
-145
0
Total
-24,293
-28,794
-30,966
-6,673
Labor, HHS, Education
Labor
State unemployment insurance, employment service operations
--
-125
--
--
Health and Human Services
Public Health Service
--
-7,000
-15,000
-15,000
Health resources and services
-25,000
-1,250
--
+25,000
Health care financing admin.
--
--
-8,000
-8,000
Centers for Disease Control
--
-1,340
--
--
National Institutes of Health
--
-5,750
-367
-367
Alcohol, Drug Abuse & Health
--
-1,641
--
--
Low income energy assistance
--
-4,056
--
--
Refugee assistance
--
-1,166
--
--
Community services block grant
--
-291
--
--
Human development services
--
-250
--
--
Education Compensatory education
--
-1,520
--
--
Impact aid
--
-20
--
--
Vocational and adult education
--
-600
-2,000
-2,000
Student financial assistance
--
-620
--
--
Higher education
--
-240
--
--
Research and statistics
--
-10
--
--
Total
-25,000
-25,879
-25,367
-367
Legislative Branch
Official mail costs
--
-20,000
-20,000
-20,000
Military Construction
Army
-9,050
-17,850
-14,050
-5,000
Navy
-17,400
-10,500
-12,000
+5,400
Air Force
-6,000
-17,970
-3,320
+2,680

5

Page 17:
Subcommittee
President's Proposed
House
Senate
Senate Compared to Proposed Rescissions
Defense agencies
-48,000
-56,100
-24,600
+23,400
Army National Guard
-16,565
-4,861
-2,772
+13,793
Air National Guard
-306
-306
-306
--
Army Reserve
-2,749
-2,749
--
+2,749
Naval Reserve
-36,000
-10,900
-10,900
+25,100
NATO
--
-14,834
-68,200
-68,200
Total
-136,070
-136,070
-136,148
-78
Transportation
Local rail freight assistance
-9,880
-5,000
--
+9,880
Urban Mass Transit Admin.
--
--
-9,880
-9,880
Bridges on federal dams
--
--
-9,880
-9,880
Total
-9,880
-10,000
-9,880
--
VA, HUD, Independent Agencies
Housing and Urban Development
HOPE grants
--
-14,400
--
--
HOME program
--
-61,500
--
--
Assisted housing
-570,980
-509,400
-743,000
-172,020
Flexible subsidy fund
-25,000
-11,700
--
+25,000
Research and technology
-400
--
--
+400
Independent Agencies
EPA
-23,276
-24,000
-40,000
-16,724
NASA
-4,150
-4,000
-14,000
-9,850
National Science Foundation
--
--
-346
-346
Total
-623,806
-625,000
-797,346
-173,540
TOAL RESCISSIONS
-7,862,773
-5,804,622
-8,287,547
-424,774

SOURCE: Congressional Quarterly, May 2, 1991

Staff Contact: Joe Cobb, 224-2946

6

Policy Luncheon, May 5, 1992

Item