Note: Conference on Federal Technology Transfer

Item

Other Media: s-leg_174_012_019_tr.txt

Transcription (Scripto): Read Full Text Only (TXT)
Extent (Dublin Core): 1 Page
File Name (Dublin Core): s-leg_174_012_019
Title (Dublin Core): Note: Conference on Federal Technology Transfer
Description (Dublin Core): Handwritten note on the House version of the Federal Technology Transfer Bill.
Date (Dublin Core): Undated
Date Created (Dublin Core): 1986
Congress (Dublin Core): 99th (1985-1987)
Topics (Dublin Core): See all items with this value Technology transfer; See all items with this value Patent laws and legislation
Policy Area (Curation): Science, Technology, Communications
Creator (Dublin Core): Dole, Robert J., 1923-2021
Record Type (Dublin Core): notes (documents)
Names (Dublin Core): See all items with this value United States. Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986
Rights (Dublin Core): http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/
Language (Dublin Core): eng
Collection Finding Aid (Dublin Core): https://dolearchivecollections.ku.edu/index.php?p=collections/findingaid&id=23&q=
Physical Location (Dublin Core): Collection 003, Box 174, Folder 12
Institution (Dublin Core): Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Archival Collection (Dublin Core): Robert J. Dole Senate Papers-Legislative Relations, 1969-1996
Full Text (Extract Text): (entire document handwritten)

Conference - On Federal Tech Transfer

Section concerned with mandates inventors must receive 15% royalties -

Ordinarily is team research - when you start naming 1 guy it causes problems in lab.

6.6 - gives a *250 (illegible) file patent

Very often piece of product is what is licensed - How much percentage is question.

Scared it may get shoved on industry.

People will want to work on royalty projects only.

At least 15% in bill now.

House bill has flexibility - this they would favor

Supposedly OMB [Office of Management and Budget] & some of Commerce are against this provision. - Also NASA & DoD [Department of Defense].

H.R. 3737 p. 15 - House Bill - Mandates a "discretionary plan" to be for formulated. - Deleted by Senate.; (entire document handwritten)

Conference - On Federal Tech Transfer

Section concerned with mandates inventors must receive 15% royalties -

Ordinarily is team research - when you start naming 1 guy it causes problems in lab.

6.6 - gives a *250 (illegible) file patent

Very often piece of product is what is licensed - How much percentage is question.

Scared it may get shoved on industry.

People will want to work on royalty projects only.

At least 15% in bill now.

House bill has flexibility - this they would favor

Supposedly OMB [Office of Management and Budget] & some of Commerce are against this provision. - Also NASA & DoD [Department of Defense].

H.R. 3737 p. 15 - House Bill - Mandates a "discretionary plan" to be for formulated. - Deleted by Senate.

Position: 1414 (9 views)