Title IX: The Half Full, Half Empty Glass

Item

Other Media
s-leg_162_005_005_tr
Transcription (Scripto)
Read Full Text Only
Extent (Dublin Core)
10 Pages
File Name (Dublin Core)
Title (Dublin Core)
Title IX: The Half Full, Half Empty Glass
Description (Dublin Core)
Report on Title IX and its effect on women's education programs in America nine years after its implementation.
Date (Dublin Core)
1981
Date Created (Dublin Core)
1981
Congress (Dublin Core)
97th (1981-1983)
Policy Area (Curation)
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Creator (Dublin Core)
National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs
Record Type (Dublin Core)
report
Publisher (Dublin Core)
U.S. Government Printing Office
Rights (Dublin Core)
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/
Language (Dublin Core)
eng
Collection Finding Aid (Dublin Core)
https://dolearchivecollections.ku.edu/index.php?p=collections/findingaid&id=23&q=
Physical Location (Dublin Core)
Institution (Dublin Core)
Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Full Text (Extract Text)
National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs
Fall 1981
Title IX: The Half Full, Half Empty Glass
(image of drinking glass filled halfway with liquid)
(text is repeated along the bottom of the cover: enrollments, counseling, degrees, employment, athletics)

THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON
WOMEN’S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

CAROLYN L. ATTNEAVE. Vice Chair
Seattle, Washington

MARIA C. BECHILY
Chicago, Illinois

BARBARA M. CAREY
Miami, Florida

ELIZA M. CARNEY
Tempe, Arizona

SISTER M. ISOLINA FERRE
Ponce, Puerto Rico

VIRGINIA A. FOXX
Banner Elk, North Carolina

JON FULLER
Ann Arbor, Michigan

ELLEN S. HOFFMAN
Washington, D.C.

KATHLEEN E. HUMPHREY
Cupertino, California

K. JESSIE KOBAYASHI
San Carlos, California

ANNA DOYLE LEVESQUE
Portsmouth, Rhode Island

RHINE L. McLIN
Dayton, Ohio

PAUL PARKS
Boston, Massachusetts

JEWEL L. PRESTAGE
Baton Rouge, Louisiana

J. RICHARD ROSSIE
Memphis, Tennessee

BERNICE R. SANDLER
Washington, D.C.

SUSAN MARGARET VANCE. Chair
Chicago, Illinois

Ex Officio Members

STAFF DIRECTOR
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

DIRECTOR. Women’s Bureau
U.S. Department of Labor

DIRECTOR. Women’s Action Program
U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services

JOY R. SIMONSON. Executive Director
Project Staff: Martine G. Brizius. Fay Anne Freedman
Manuscript Preparation: Kathleen Davito
1832 M Street. N.W., Suite 821
Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 653-5846


Title IX: The Half Full, Half Empty Glass
(image of drinking glass filled halfway with liquid)
Fall 1981
National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs
Established by the Women’s Educational Equity Act, 1974. -- U.S. Department of Education
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402
national advisory council on women’s educational programs

TO THE WOMEN and MEN,
older, younger, and yet unborn,
whose lives will be enriched by continued progress
toward equality of opportunity in education,
the National Advisory Council on
Women’s Educational Programs
dedicates this report.


PREFACE
In 1974 Congress declared that "educational programs in the United States... are frequently inequitable as such programs relate to women and frequently limit the full participation of all individuals in American society." Through the enactment of the Women's Educational Equity Act of 1974, Congress authorized the Department of Education to support state and local agencies, non-profit organizations, and individuals to conduct activities "to provide educational equity for women." The National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs was also established under the original Women's Educational Equity Act. The 20 members of the Council, 17 appointed by the President and three ex-officio members, make policy recommendations to Federal officials regarding the improvement of educational equity for women.
The Council's mandate includes not only the Women's Educational Equity Act (WEEA) program, but all Federal policies and programs affecting women's educational equity at all levels. From its inception, the Council has focused major attention on Title IX of the 1972 Education Amendments which prohibits sex discrimination in Federally assisted education programs and activities.
The past nine years have seen much progress toward the goal of Title IX, far more than is generally recognized. But many problems still remain. The position of women and girls in education today resembles the glass which is half full or half empty, depending on one's outlook. The Advisory Council believes that the American public--parents, students, educators--need to know more about the changes in the educational system resulting from this important law. We hope that this publication will contribute to understanding of and support for Title IX, which has been appropriately dubbed "A Law for All People."
[Signature]
Susan Margaret Vance, Chair
National Advisory Council on
Women's Educational Programs

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION....1
Why Title IX?
What Does Title IX Say?

II. WHAT IS THE ECONOMIC PICTURE?....5

III. IMPROVEMENTS IN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES....9
Enrollment Changes
Student Viewpoints
Student Activities
Viewpoints of Staff and Parents

IV. STUDENT SERVICES....19
Counseling
Financial Aid
Health Services

V. WHO GETS ADMITTED?....25
What Has Happened to College Enrollments?
Community Colleges
Bachelor's Degrees
Master's Degrees
Doctoral Degrees
Professional Degrees

VI. GAINS IN EMPLOYMENT....33
Elementary and Secondary Education
Higher Education
Complaints of Violations

VII. HOW HAS ATHLETICS CHANGED?.... 39
High Schools
Two Year Colleges
Four Year Colleges
Athletic Budgets
Scholarships

VIII. HOW DOES IT ALL ADD UP?.... 51

IX. APPENDICES.... 53

A. Title IX Activities of National Organizations
B. Title IX Regulation
C. Laws On Sex Discrimination in Education and Employment
D. Sources
E. NACWEP Publications

[Black and white photo of Women in Mechanical work clothes working on a car]

INTRODUCTION

Why Title IX?

During the 1970's, sex bias and discrimination in American schools emerged as a major public policy issue. Women, returning to the labor force in record numbers, began to reexamine their educational preparation and career prospects. In the face of a wide and persistent earnings gap between men and women, citizens and educators began to study more closely the inequities in schools and colleges. Also during this time, many advocacy groups, including the Women's Equity Action League (WEAL), filed class action charges against hundreds of colleges which had contracts with the Federal government, charging them with sex discrimination in employment. Furthermore, the President's Task Force on Women's Rights and Responsibilities issued its report in 1971 documenting the existence of sex bias in American society and recommending numerous legislative changes to ban sex discrimination in education and other areas.
In this climate, Congress passed a bill in 1972 that included the now famous Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in schools receiving Federal financial assistance. On July 1, the Education Amendments of 1972, including Title IX, became law.
Because of an unusually thorough process of citizen involvement across the country, the final regulation to implement Title IX was not issued by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and
signed by President Ford until July 1975. The Department's Office for Civil Rights was assigned enforcement responsibility for Title IX.

1

What Does Title IX Say?

The key section of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 states:
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
This brief language of the law is interpreted through a detailed regulation, which spells out the criteria for identifying and eliminating sex discrimination in education programs and activities. Because public attention has focused mainly on inequities in collegiate athletics, many people mistakenly believe that Title IX relates solely to athletics. In fact, the broad scope of the regulation provides that females and males must be offered equal opportunity in:
* admissions to most education institutions*;
* access to, and treatment in, curricular and extracurricular programs and activities sponsored by education agencies and institutions at all levels;
* treatment under regulations and policies governing student benefits, services, and conduct;

* access to employment as well as terms, conditions, and benefits of such employment in education agencies and institutions.**
* Private undergraduate institutions and public single sex institutions are exempt from this provision.
** A pending Supreme Court decision may alter coverage of employment. Legislative and regulatory changes in this coverage are also under consideration.

2


Title IX does not require educational institutions to provide any particular programs, facilities, or services; it simply requires that any which are offered be provided on a non-discriminatory basis to women and men alike.
Virtually all school districts and most colleges and universities receive Federal financial assistance through grants, contracts, or loans under programs ranging from school lunch subsidies to college housing construction, from grants for vocational education to graduate fellowships and other student aid. Therefore, the impact of Title IX has been felt throughout the nation at every level of education. Although implementation and enforcement have been plagued by a number of problems, such as insufficient resources for the Office for Civil Rights, ambiguous guidance on policy questions, and inadequate public understanding of the purpose and requirements of the law, Title IX is contributing to major improvements in American education.
This overview of the effects of Title IX highlights the compelling economic arguments for broader educational opportunities for women and girls. Next it looks at several major aspects of education affected by this law: enrollments in various programs, student services and activities, admissions and degrees in higher education institutions, employment of women and men in the education system, and athletics. The report combines statistics which give evidence of problems and progress with personal experiences to illustrate the human significance of Title IX.

3
National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs
Fall 1981
Title IX: The Half Full, Half Empty Glass
(image of drinking glass filled halfway with liquid)
(text is repeated along the bottom of the cover: enrollments, counseling, degrees, employment, athletics)

THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON
WOMEN’S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

CAROLYN L. ATTNEAVE. Vice Chair
Seattle, Washington

MARIA C. BECHILY
Chicago, Illinois

BARBARA M. CAREY
Miami, Florida

ELIZA M. CARNEY
Tempe, Arizona

SISTER M. ISOLINA FERRE
Ponce, Puerto Rico

VIRGINIA A. FOXX
Banner Elk, North Carolina

JON FULLER
Ann Arbor, Michigan

ELLEN S. HOFFMAN
Washington, D.C.

KATHLEEN E. HUMPHREY
Cupertino, California

K. JESSIE KOBAYASHI
San Carlos, California

ANNA DOYLE LEVESQUE
Portsmouth, Rhode Island

RHINE L. McLIN
Dayton, Ohio

PAUL PARKS
Boston, Massachusetts

JEWEL L. PRESTAGE
Baton Rouge, Louisiana

J. RICHARD ROSSIE
Memphis, Tennessee

BERNICE R. SANDLER
Washington, D.C.

SUSAN MARGARET VANCE. Chair
Chicago, Illinois

Ex Officio Members

STAFF DIRECTOR
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

DIRECTOR. Women’s Bureau
U.S. Department of Labor

DIRECTOR. Women’s Action Program
U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services

JOY R. SIMONSON. Executive Director
Project Staff: Martine G. Brizius. Fay Anne Freedman
Manuscript Preparation: Kathleen Davito
1832 M Street. N.W., Suite 821
Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 653-5846


Title IX: The Half Full, Half Empty Glass
(image of drinking glass filled halfway with liquid)
Fall 1981
National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs
Established by the Women’s Educational Equity Act, 1974. -- U.S. Department of Education
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402
national advisory council on women’s educational programs

TO THE WOMEN and MEN,
older, younger, and yet unborn,
whose lives will be enriched by continued progress
toward equality of opportunity in education,
the National Advisory Council on
Women’s Educational Programs
dedicates this report.


PREFACE
In 1974 Congress declared that "educational programs in the United States... are frequently inequitable as such programs relate to women and frequently limit the full participation of all individuals in American society." Through the enactment of the Women's Educational Equity Act of 1974, Congress authorized the Department of Education to support state and local agencies, non-profit organizations, and individuals to conduct activities "to provide educational equity for women." The National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs was also established under the original Women's Educational Equity Act. The 20 members of the Council, 17 appointed by the President and three ex-officio members, make policy recommendations to Federal officials regarding the improvement of educational equity for women.
The Council's mandate includes not only the Women's Educational Equity Act (WEEA) program, but all Federal policies and programs affecting women's educational equity at all levels. From its inception, the Council has focused major attention on Title IX of the 1972 Education Amendments which prohibits sex discrimination in Federally assisted education programs and activities.
The past nine years have seen much progress toward the goal of Title IX, far more than is generally recognized. But many problems still remain. The position of women and girls in education today resembles the glass which is half full or half empty, depending on one's outlook. The Advisory Council believes that the American public--parents, students, educators--need to know more about the changes in the educational system resulting from this important law. We hope that this publication will contribute to understanding of and support for Title IX, which has been appropriately dubbed "A Law for All People."
[Signature]
Susan Margaret Vance, Chair
National Advisory Council on
Women's Educational Programs

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION....1
Why Title IX?
What Does Title IX Say?

II. WHAT IS THE ECONOMIC PICTURE?....5

III. IMPROVEMENTS IN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES....9
Enrollment Changes
Student Viewpoints
Student Activities
Viewpoints of Staff and Parents

IV. STUDENT SERVICES....19
Counseling
Financial Aid
Health Services

V. WHO GETS ADMITTED?....25
What Has Happened to College Enrollments?
Community Colleges
Bachelor's Degrees
Master's Degrees
Doctoral Degrees
Professional Degrees

VI. GAINS IN EMPLOYMENT....33
Elementary and Secondary Education
Higher Education
Complaints of Violations

VII. HOW HAS ATHLETICS CHANGED?.... 39
High Schools
Two Year Colleges
Four Year Colleges
Athletic Budgets
Scholarships

VIII. HOW DOES IT ALL ADD UP?.... 51

IX. APPENDICES.... 53

A. Title IX Activities of National Organizations
B. Title IX Regulation
C. Laws On Sex Discrimination in Education and Employment
D. Sources
E. NACWEP Publications

[Black and white photo of Women in Mechanical work clothes working on a car]

INTRODUCTION

Why Title IX?

During the 1970's, sex bias and discrimination in American schools emerged as a major public policy issue. Women, returning to the labor force in record numbers, began to reexamine their educational preparation and career prospects. In the face of a wide and persistent earnings gap between men and women, citizens and educators began to study more closely the inequities in schools and colleges. Also during this time, many advocacy groups, including the Women's Equity Action League (WEAL), filed class action charges against hundreds of colleges which had contracts with the Federal government, charging them with sex discrimination in employment. Furthermore, the President's Task Force on Women's Rights and Responsibilities issued its report in 1971 documenting the existence of sex bias in American society and recommending numerous legislative changes to ban sex discrimination in education and other areas.
In this climate, Congress passed a bill in 1972 that included the now famous Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in schools receiving Federal financial assistance. On July 1, the Education Amendments of 1972, including Title IX, became law.
Because of an unusually thorough process of citizen involvement across the country, the final regulation to implement Title IX was not issued by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and
signed by President Ford until July 1975. The Department's Office for Civil Rights was assigned enforcement responsibility for Title IX.

1

What Does Title IX Say?

The key section of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 states:
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
This brief language of the law is interpreted through a detailed regulation, which spells out the criteria for identifying and eliminating sex discrimination in education programs and activities. Because public attention has focused mainly on inequities in collegiate athletics, many people mistakenly believe that Title IX relates solely to athletics. In fact, the broad scope of the regulation provides that females and males must be offered equal opportunity in:
* admissions to most education institutions*;
* access to, and treatment in, curricular and extracurricular programs and activities sponsored by education agencies and institutions at all levels;
* treatment under regulations and policies governing student benefits, services, and conduct;

* access to employment as well as terms, conditions, and benefits of such employment in education agencies and institutions.**
* Private undergraduate institutions and public single sex institutions are exempt from this provision.
** A pending Supreme Court decision may alter coverage of employment. Legislative and regulatory changes in this coverage are also under consideration.

2


Title IX does not require educational institutions to provide any particular programs, facilities, or services; it simply requires that any which are offered be provided on a non-discriminatory basis to women and men alike.
Virtually all school districts and most colleges and universities receive Federal financial assistance through grants, contracts, or loans under programs ranging from school lunch subsidies to college housing construction, from grants for vocational education to graduate fellowships and other student aid. Therefore, the impact of Title IX has been felt throughout the nation at every level of education. Although implementation and enforcement have been plagued by a number of problems, such as insufficient resources for the Office for Civil Rights, ambiguous guidance on policy questions, and inadequate public understanding of the purpose and requirements of the law, Title IX is contributing to major improvements in American education.
This overview of the effects of Title IX highlights the compelling economic arguments for broader educational opportunities for women and girls. Next it looks at several major aspects of education affected by this law: enrollments in various programs, student services and activities, admissions and degrees in higher education institutions, employment of women and men in the education system, and athletics. The report combines statistics which give evidence of problems and progress with personal experiences to illustrate the human significance of Title IX.

3
National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs
Fall 1981
Title IX: The Half Full, Half Empty Glass
(image of drinking glass filled halfway with liquid)
(text is repeated along the bottom of the cover: enrollments, counseling, degrees, employment, athletics)

THE NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON
WOMEN’S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

CAROLYN L. ATTNEAVE. Vice Chair
Seattle, Washington

MARIA C. BECHILY
Chicago, Illinois

BARBARA M. CAREY
Miami, Florida

ELIZA M. CARNEY
Tempe, Arizona

SISTER M. ISOLINA FERRE
Ponce, Puerto Rico

VIRGINIA A. FOXX
Banner Elk, North Carolina

JON FULLER
Ann Arbor, Michigan

ELLEN S. HOFFMAN
Washington, D.C.

KATHLEEN E. HUMPHREY
Cupertino, California

K. JESSIE KOBAYASHI
San Carlos, California

ANNA DOYLE LEVESQUE
Portsmouth, Rhode Island

RHINE L. McLIN
Dayton, Ohio

PAUL PARKS
Boston, Massachusetts

JEWEL L. PRESTAGE
Baton Rouge, Louisiana

J. RICHARD ROSSIE
Memphis, Tennessee

BERNICE R. SANDLER
Washington, D.C.

SUSAN MARGARET VANCE. Chair
Chicago, Illinois

Ex Officio Members

STAFF DIRECTOR
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

DIRECTOR. Women’s Bureau
U.S. Department of Labor

DIRECTOR. Women’s Action Program
U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services

JOY R. SIMONSON. Executive Director
Project Staff: Martine G. Brizius. Fay Anne Freedman
Manuscript Preparation: Kathleen Davito
1832 M Street. N.W., Suite 821
Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 653-5846


Title IX: The Half Full, Half Empty Glass
(image of drinking glass filled halfway with liquid)
Fall 1981
National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs
Established by the Women’s Educational Equity Act, 1974. -- U.S. Department of Education
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402
national advisory council on women’s educational programs

TO THE WOMEN and MEN,
older, younger, and yet unborn,
whose lives will be enriched by continued progress
toward equality of opportunity in education,
the National Advisory Council on
Women’s Educational Programs
dedicates this report.


PREFACE
In 1974 Congress declared that "educational programs in the United States... are frequently inequitable as such programs relate to women and frequently limit the full participation of all individuals in American society." Through the enactment of the Women's Educational Equity Act of 1974, Congress authorized the Department of Education to support state and local agencies, non-profit organizations, and individuals to conduct activities "to provide educational equity for women." The National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs was also established under the original Women's Educational Equity Act. The 20 members of the Council, 17 appointed by the President and three ex-officio members, make policy recommendations to Federal officials regarding the improvement of educational equity for women.
The Council's mandate includes not only the Women's Educational Equity Act (WEEA) program, but all Federal policies and programs affecting women's educational equity at all levels. From its inception, the Council has focused major attention on Title IX of the 1972 Education Amendments which prohibits sex discrimination in Federally assisted education programs and activities.
The past nine years have seen much progress toward the goal of Title IX, far more than is generally recognized. But many problems still remain. The position of women and girls in education today resembles the glass which is half full or half empty, depending on one's outlook. The Advisory Council believes that the American public--parents, students, educators--need to know more about the changes in the educational system resulting from this important law. We hope that this publication will contribute to understanding of and support for Title IX, which has been appropriately dubbed "A Law for All People."
[Signature]
Susan Margaret Vance, Chair
National Advisory Council on
Women's Educational Programs

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION....1
Why Title IX?
What Does Title IX Say?

II. WHAT IS THE ECONOMIC PICTURE?....5

III. IMPROVEMENTS IN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES....9
Enrollment Changes
Student Viewpoints
Student Activities
Viewpoints of Staff and Parents

IV. STUDENT SERVICES....19
Counseling
Financial Aid
Health Services

V. WHO GETS ADMITTED?....25
What Has Happened to College Enrollments?
Community Colleges
Bachelor's Degrees
Master's Degrees
Doctoral Degrees
Professional Degrees

VI. GAINS IN EMPLOYMENT....33
Elementary and Secondary Education
Higher Education
Complaints of Violations

VII. HOW HAS ATHLETICS CHANGED?.... 39
High Schools
Two Year Colleges
Four Year Colleges
Athletic Budgets
Scholarships

VIII. HOW DOES IT ALL ADD UP?.... 51

IX. APPENDICES.... 53

A. Title IX Activities of National Organizations
B. Title IX Regulation
C. Laws On Sex Discrimination in Education and Employment
D. Sources
E. NACWEP Publications

[Black and white photo of Women in Mechanical work clothes working on a car]

INTRODUCTION

Why Title IX?

During the 1970's, sex bias and discrimination in American schools emerged as a major public policy issue. Women, returning to the labor force in record numbers, began to reexamine their educational preparation and career prospects. In the face of a wide and persistent earnings gap between men and women, citizens and educators began to study more closely the inequities in schools and colleges. Also during this time, many advocacy groups, including the Women's Equity Action League (WEAL), filed class action charges against hundreds of colleges which had contracts with the Federal government, charging them with sex discrimination in employment. Furthermore, the President's Task Force on Women's Rights and Responsibilities issued its report in 1971 documenting the existence of sex bias in American society and recommending numerous legislative changes to ban sex discrimination in education and other areas.
In this climate, Congress passed a bill in 1972 that included the now famous Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in schools receiving Federal financial assistance. On July 1, the Education Amendments of 1972, including Title IX, became law.
Because of an unusually thorough process of citizen involvement across the country, the final regulation to implement Title IX was not issued by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and
signed by President Ford until July 1975. The Department's Office for Civil Rights was assigned enforcement responsibility for Title IX.

1

What Does Title IX Say?

The key section of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 states:
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
This brief language of the law is interpreted through a detailed regulation, which spells out the criteria for identifying and eliminating sex discrimination in education programs and activities. Because public attention has focused mainly on inequities in collegiate athletics, many people mistakenly believe that Title IX relates solely to athletics. In fact, the broad scope of the regulation provides that females and males must be offered equal opportunity in:
* admissions to most education institutions*;
* access to, and treatment in, curricular and extracurricular programs and activities sponsored by education agencies and institutions at all levels;
* treatment under regulations and policies governing student benefits, services, and conduct;

* access to employment as well as terms, conditions, and benefits of such employment in education agencies and institutions.**
* Private undergraduate institutions and public single sex institutions are exempt from this provision.
** A pending Supreme Court decision may alter coverage of employment. Legislative and regulatory changes in this coverage are also under consideration.

2


Title IX does not require educational institutions to provide any particular programs, facilities, or services; it simply requires that any which are offered be provided on a non-discriminatory basis to women and men alike.
Virtually all school districts and most colleges and universities receive Federal financial assistance through grants, contracts, or loans under programs ranging from school lunch subsidies to college housing construction, from grants for vocational education to graduate fellowships and other student aid. Therefore, the impact of Title IX has been felt throughout the nation at every level of education. Although implementation and enforcement have been plagued by a number of problems, such as insufficient resources for the Office for Civil Rights, ambiguous guidance on policy questions, and inadequate public understanding of the purpose and requirements of the law, Title IX is contributing to major improvements in American education.
This overview of the effects of Title IX highlights the compelling economic arguments for broader educational opportunities for women and girls. Next it looks at several major aspects of education affected by this law: enrollments in various programs, student services and activities, admissions and degrees in higher education institutions, employment of women and men in the education system, and athletics. The report combines statistics which give evidence of problems and progress with personal experiences to illustrate the human significance of Title IX.

3

Export

Position: 370 (9 views)