(page 1) May 15, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: SENATOR DOLE FROM : DENNIS SHEA SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE REPUBLICAN ETHICS TASK FORCE Attached for your review is a list of issues that Sen. Rudman would like to discuss at tomorrow's meeting of the Republican Ethics Task Force. The meeting is currently scheduled for noon in S-230. 1. Partisan v. Bipartisan Approach The primary topic of discussion will be whether the Republicans should work together with the Democrats to develop a joint Congressional ethics package or whether the Republicans should proceed independently. The Democratic Task Force has indicated that it would like to cooperate with the Republicans. Sen. Rudman also believes that a cooperative approach ought to be taken. 2. Post-Employment Lobbying Restrictions The second topic of discussion will probably be post-employment lobbying restrictions. Under current law, executive branch personnel are generally prohibited from contacting other members of the executive branch during the year immediately following their departure from government service. The President's Government-Wide Ethics Act (the "Act") would extend this 1-year cooling-off period to senior personnel in the legislative and judicial branches. Under the Act, former members of Congress would be barred from contacting Members in either House of Congress during the cooling-off period. Former Congressional staff would also be barred from contacting staff employed by the specific body of Congress for which they had previously worked. The Act would also prohibit former executive and legislative branch personnel from disclosing non-public government information during the 2-year period following their departure from government service. These post-employment restrictions are similar to the post-employment restrictions contained in the ethics bill passed by Congress last year but vetoed by President Reagan. The restrictions, however, are less severe than the restrictions contained in S. 1, the bill introduced by Senators Thurmond and Metzenbaum and passed by the Senate in April of 1988. The staff of the Democratic Ethics Task Force has recommended the adoption of S. 1 with certain minor modifications. (page 2) TUESDAY, MAY 16, 1989 12:00 NOON - S-230 Task Force on Ethics re: how to proceed on President's Ethics Act Dole Danforth Roth Rudman Stevens Thurmond Lott Wallop (page 3) MAJOR ISSUES BEFORE THE GOP ETHICS TASK FORCE 1 :highlighted: 1. Partisan vs. Bipartisan Approach :highlighted: 2. Post-Employment Contact CURRENT: Executive branch employees prohibited from (a) representing a party for life on matters in which they were personally and subtantially involved, (b) from representing a party for 2 years on matters under their official responsibility, and (c) in case of some GS-16's and all EL-5's or higher, from contacting anyone in their former agency for 1 year. The Office of Government Ethics can divide (compartmentalize) agencies into separate components for purposes of this statute. Senate rules prohibit former Senators from contacting the Senate for 1 year and Senate staff from contacting certain staff and Members depending on where they worked. No rule governs the House. :highlighted: BUSH: Retains current law, except that: (a) Congress would be covered; (b) the scope of the 1 year ban is extended down to all GS-17's and no GS-16's; (c) compartmentalization is prohibited only for the Executive Office of the President; and (d) a new crime of releasing protected information. DEM. STAFF: S. 1 (same as bill passed by Senate in April, 1988) with some modifications. This is substantially more restrictive than either the Bush proposal or the bill vetoed by President Reagan. :end highlight: Among other things: (a) the 1 year ban would apply to everyone over GS-16; (b) for Cabinet officials, EL-2's, and Members of Congress, the 1 year ban would apply to the entire branch and comparably ranked officials from the other branch; (d) compartmentalization would be prohibited across the board; (e) a new crime for releasing information relating to trade or treaty negotiations. ALTERNATIVE 1: Accept Democratic staff proposal. ALTERNATIVE 2: Modified Bush proposal or H.R. 5043 (the bill passed by both houses of Congress in October) . :highlighted: 3. Office of Congressional Ethics CURRENT: No such office. :highlighted: BUSH: Creates office for management of financial disclosure and to investigate and report on allegations involving Members and congressional staff. (page 4) 2 DEM. STAFF: Retains current law. 4. Financial Disclosure :highlighted: BUSH: Major changes from current law include: (a) actual value reporting in lieu of the ranges; (b) prohibiting individuals from managing blind trusts; (c) exempting the underlying assets held by widely diversified investment companies; and (d) applying the executive branch requirements and procedures to Congress, include the vesting of waiver authority in the Office of Government Ethics. :end highlight: :highlighted: DEM. STAFF: :end highlight: Accepts (b) and (c), above. Retains reporting of assets and incomes by ranges, :highlighted: but adds a new category of assets in excess of $1,000,000. :end highlight: Retains management of the current system for Congress in the 2 Ethics Committees. :highlighted: 5. Gifts/Travel CURRENT: Acceptance of gifts by employees is generally prohibited in the executive branch from any person with interests before that agency. Travel acceptance authority varies by agency. Congress is governed by Senate and House gift rules. These permit gifts up to $100 from "prohibited sources"; gifts of any amount from others subject to financial disclosure; meals, beverages, and entertainment in any amount in the Senate; and travel when in return for consideration of equal or greater value. :highlighted: BUSH: Uniform government wide rules for acceptance of gift and travel, to be developed by OGE (gifts) and GSA (travel) . Travel reimbursement must be reasonable (as defined by GSA) and be passed through the employing agency. :end highlight: DEM. STAFF: Deferred to leadership. Retain current law in interim. ALTERNATIVE 1: Concur with Democratic staff proposal. ALTERNATIVE 2: Accept Bush proposal as it relates to the executive branch. Retain current law for Congress. ALTERNATIVE 3: Accept Bush proposal as it relates to the executive branch. Write new gift/travel rules for Senate which restrict travel to necessary reimbursements and limit enterntainment exception to gift rule. :highlighted: 6. Conflict of Interest CURRENT: Criminal statute does not apply to legislative branch. (page 5) 3 :highlighted: BUSH: Applies criminal statute to congressional staff and the Judiciary, and to Members of Congress with regard to present or future compensation (except as it relates to their compensation as a Member of Congress). :end highlight: DEM. STAFF: Retain current law. ALTERNATIVE: Apply to legislative and judicial branches only as it relates to current or future compensation. :highlighted: 7. Independent Counsel -- Members of Congress CURRENT: Appointment of Independent Counsels is mandatory for the President, Vice President, Cabinet officers, White House officials paid the same salary as Members of Congress, Justice officials paid at EL-3 or higher (one step below Members), and the Chairman and Treasurer of the President's principal campaign committee. :end highlight: For all other individuals, the decision to appoint an I.C. is at the discretion of the Attorney General. :highlighted: BUSH : Add Members of Congress to the list of officials for whom an I.C. is required. :end highlight: DEM. STAFF: Retain current law. 8. Independent Counsel -- Generally CURRENT: An I.C., once appointed, is essentially a free agent. His jurisdiction is restricted by the Court's initial order and cannot be expanded without the Attorney General's concurrence. Other than that, he runs his own operation subject only to federal law. The current authorizing statute was sponsored by Levin, enacted in 1979, and does not expire until 1984. :highlighted: BUSH: Places jurisdictional and personnel practices under the control of the Attorney General. Requires that the Court name an I.C. from a list of 15 current or former prosecutors suggested by the Attorney General. :end highlight: States that the Attorney General retains any authority federal law requires him to exercise personally. Grants the Attorney General greater latitude in deciding whether to appoint an I.C. and more time to reach the decision. DEM. STAFF: Retains current law. ALTERNATIVE 1: Retain current law. ALTERNATIVE 2: Include Bush proposal (or elements thereof) with the goal of negotiating some changes in current law. (page 6) Joyce TUESDAY, MAY 16, 1989 12:00 NOON - S-230 Task Force on Ethics re: how to proceed on President's Ethics Act :selected: Dole :selected: Danforth :selected: Roth :selected: Rudman :selected: Stevens :selected: Thurmond :selected: Lott :selected: Wallop (page 7) Subject: task force on ethics how to proceed on Presidents Ethie Bert Tuesday DATE May, 16.1989 TIME: 12:00 noon LOCATION: 5-230 REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP Senator Position Invited Yes No Armstrong Policy Chairman Chafee Conference Cochran Conference Secretary Dole Republican Leader :selected: :selected: Nickles Senatorial Committee Simpson Asst. Republican Leader RANKING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Senator Ranking Member Invited Yes No Boschwitz Small Business Chafee Environment Cohen Intelligence Danforth Commerce :selected: :selected: Domenici Budget Garn Banking Hatch Labor Hatfield Appropriations Heinz Special-Aging Helms Foreign Relations Lugar Agriculture McCain Select-Indian Affairs McClure Energy Murkowski Veterans Affairs Packwood Finance Roth Govt. Affairs & Jt Eco. Cmte. :selected: :selected: Rudman Select-Ethics :selected: :selected: Stevens Rules & Administration w.c.b. :selected: :selected: Thurmond Judiciary :selected: :selected: Warner Armed Services REPUBLICANS Bond Kassebaum Burns Kasten Coats · Lott 4 6253 D'Amato Mack Durenberger McConnell Gorton Pressier Gramm Specter Grassley Symms Humphrey · Wallop 46441 Jeffords Wilson :selected: web OTHERS: DEMOCRATS Adams Kennedy Baucus Kerrey Bentsen Kerry Biden Kohl Bingaman Lautenberg Boren Leahy Bradley Levin Breaux Lieberman Bryant Matsunaga Bumpers Metzenbaum Burdick Mikulski Byrd Mitchell Conrad Moynihan Cranston Nunn Daschle Pell DeConcini Pryor Dixon Reid Dodd Riegle Exon Robb Ford Rockefeller Fowler Sanford Glenn Sarbanes Gore Sasser Graham Shelby Harkin Simon Heflin Wirth Hollings Inouye Johnston GPO: 1989 92-509 (m) :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: :unselected: